Mediator.
Trial Lawyer.
Fractional General Counsel.

CHRISTOPHER DOYLE
Mediation costs a small fraction of what litigation can cost, and it gives parties something trial does not: control over the outcome. It has become a core part of how disputes are resolved, and it can happen at any stage of a case. Early on, sometimes before a lawsuit is even filed, it can resolve a dispute before discovery and motion practice drive up costs and harden positions. Later, often near trial, it lets the parties weigh a certain resolution against the risk of an adverse judgment. Mediation is confidential and can preserve business and family relationships that litigation strains. It also allows for resolutions courts cannot order.
As an advocate, I've taken part in hundreds of mediation sessions, and I understand both what drives conflict and what motivates parties to end it. I completed "Mediating the Litigated Case," a 40-hour program of the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution at Pepperdine Caruso School of Law, and I bring a litigator's grasp of what is at stake to the mediator's role: the legal merits; the cost, uncertainty, and risk of going forward; and the pressures, often unspoken, that shape the parties' positions.
I've litigated complex commercial disputes in California's state and federal courts since 1997, concentrating in real property, lender liability, title insurance, mortgage and consumer finance, financial elder abuse, and business torts. I've tried cases to judge and jury, won them on dispositive motions, and resolved them through arbitration and mediation.
My career began at McDonough, Holland & Allen in Sacramento and continued at Miller Starr Regalia and Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell in the Bay Area. I founded my own practice in 2018, co-founded Doyle & Harris, PC in 2021, and returned to independent practice as Doyle Counsel in 2026. Building and running a firm taught me what litigation alone doesn't: the legal and business realities of ownership, partnership, and growth, and the everyday decisions that determine whether an enterprise thrives.
Today I work with financial institutions, startups, and mid-market businesses that need senior legal judgment on demand, whether that means avoiding a dispute or resolving one faster and at lower cost. I also advise collectors, dealers, estates, and institutions on art law: title, authentication, provenance, and the risks of acquiring works with uncertain histories. The goal isn't always simply to win. It's to achieve what the client needs under the circumstances, with candor about both the opportunities and the risks.
My training in literature and the humanities shapes that work. Language, context, narrative, and audience are central to advocacy and to resolution. When technology can retrieve and summarize information in seconds, the value of experienced counsel lies in knowing which questions to ask, recognizing what matters, and noticing what's missing.
If you're exploring mediation, evaluating fractional general counsel, or want advice on a dispute before it escalates, I'd welcome the conversation.
EDUCATION
Stanford University, Stanford, CA
B.A., Creative Writing and English Literature
Stanford University, Stanford, CA
M.A., English Literature
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law, Sacramento, CA
J.D.
BAR ADMISSIONS
California Bar — Licensed & Active, 1997–Present
U.S. District Courts — Central, Eastern, Northern & Southern Districts of California
U.S. Supreme Court
EXPERIENCE
Doyle Counsel — Founder
San Diego · 2026–Present
Independent legal practice focused on fractional general counsel services, litigation, investigations, strategic legal advice, and dispute resolution.
Doyle & Harris, PC — Founder & President
San Francisco & San Diego · 2021–2026
Founded and led an independent litigation practice handling complex business, real-property, mortgage, and financial-services disputes in state and federal court.
Doyle Counsel — Founder
San Francisco · 2018–2021
Founded independent litigation practice representing businesses and individuals in complex civil disputes, with an emphasis on real property and business litigation.
Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell — San Francisco, CA
2008–2018
Complex business, real-property, mortgage, tort, and financial-services litigation in federal and state court.
Miller Starr Regalia — Walnut Creek, CA
2000–2008
Civil litigation practice in state and federal court, with emphasis on real-property, business, lender-liability, and mortgage litigation, including complex disputes involving title, lending, and commercial transactions.
McDonough, Holland & Allen — Sacramento, CA
1997–2000
Civil litigation practice in state and federal court.
PRACTICE AREAS
Fractional General Counsel
Litigation
Strategic Legal Advice
Investigations
Mediation & Dispute Resolution
Real Property · Lender Liability
Mortgage & Consumer Finance Litigation
Fine Art & Provenance
CERTIFICATIONS
Mediating the Litigated Case (MLC)
Certificate, Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, Pepperdine Caruso School of Law · 2026
AI Institute, Certificate of Completion
UC Berkeley School of Law · 2025
General Counsel Certification
UC Berkeley School of Law · 2025
AFFILIATIONS & RECOGNITION
Super Lawyers
San Francisco Bar Association
San Diego County Bar Association
PAIAM — Professional Advisors to the International Art Market
ProVisors — San Francisco 7
Stanford Alumni Association
Litigation
(representative)
San Francisco
Six-week jury trial in San Francisco Superior Court representing a mortgage lender in a real-property dispute during the height of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. Following the jury verdict, the court determined that the client was the prevailing party and awarded costs.
Sacramento
Lengthy bench trial in Sacramento Superior Court representing a corporate defendant in a complex real-property, tax, and title dispute. Obtained terminating sanctions against a key opposing party for deliberate discovery abuse. Judgment later entered in favor of the client.
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
Representing a defendant lender, obtained dismissal of claims alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act, breach of fiduciary duty, violation of California Civil Code section 2923.4, and entitlement to injunctive relief. The court granted the initial motion to dismiss with limited leave to amend and later granted a renewed motion to dismiss without leave to amend, ending the case.
